2
$\begingroup$

China is labelled by some to be a 'currency manipulator', that is supposedly pegged to the US Dollar. What is the difference between currency manipulation and a fixed regime?

Different motives? I figure that it may be that a textbook fixed regime is undertaken to prevent instability, and is minor (just to correct volatility), whereas manipulation is done with the aim of gaining an unfair advantage.

Different means? I have also read that it could be due to the fact that a manipulator creates domestic base money with which it can buy currency, without sterilisation.

Legality? BVJ below makes an interesting comment about the legality of the two... is there a legal framework in which some forms of fixed currency maintenance are allowed and some not?

Could anyone please clarify? Thanks.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I think that fixed currency is usualy done through legal means, defining the exchange to some level and forcing the currency to be traded in a certain way. Whereas curency manipulation is done by market mechanisms like controling investment or leveraging taxes. Though It might be just the case of the examples I can think of fixed and manipulated exchange. $\endgroup$ – BVJ Apr 20 '15 at 12:09
  • $\begingroup$ Hey @BVJ - many thanks for the comment- this sounds as if it could very much be the difference. Are there any legal frameworks, that mean that some fixed regimes are permitted (i.e. by WTO) and others not? $\endgroup$ – Ag3nt Apr 20 '15 at 19:28
0
$\begingroup$

Correct, both a fixed exchange rate and a manipulated exchange rate involve the government setting this price. In BOTH cases it is usually implemented by promising to standing ready to buy or sell any amount at the fixed price. Of course, countries don't always have enough foreign cash to sell it at the promised price, nor do they always want to buy as much as the markets sell to them

The difference is, as you suggest, whether the trading partners (the US is usually the one that labels others manipulators) conclude that the exchange rate is fixed at a too depreciated level. This level keeps foreign goods cheap in the US and US goods expensive in the foreign country.

Also, a fixed exchange rate is often set at a lvel that seems "too high", the only question being whether the government will manage to keep it so high, since it creates an incentive for its citizens to buy foreign goods. Instead a manipulated currency is deemed to be "too low".

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.