6
$\begingroup$

I've been reading a book on a Kaleckian economics model, but there is a recursive function that has been bothering me. Can anyone provide some insight into why the equation why designed like this?

Quote from the book:

$Y = \min\{aE, uK\} \quad (1.1)$

Equation (1.1) denotes the fixed-coefficients production function, where $u$ denotes output; $E$, employment; $K$, capital stock; $a = Y/E$, labor productivity; and $u = Y/K$, the output-capital ratio. In the following analysis, we assume that the capital-potential output ratio is unity. From this, we can regard the output-capital ratio $u = Y/K$ as the capacity utilization rate.$^{4)}$ ...

$4)$ The capacity utilization rate $u$ is defined as $u = Y/Y^*$, where $Y$ denotes the actual output and $Y^*$ denotes the potential output. The capacity utilization rate is decomposed into $u = (Y/K)(K/Y^*)$, where $K/Y^*$ denotes the capital/potential output ratio and captures the production technology. If we assume that $K/Y^*$ is constant, then $u$ and $Y/K$ change in the same direction. From this, we can regard the output/capital ratio as the capacity utilization rate. In this chapter, for simplicity, we assume that $K/Y^* = 1$. Therefore, we obtain $u = Y/K.$

I assume $a$ and $u$ are the fixed coefficients. But even if we suppose $uK < aE $ then since $u = Y/K$, we should have $uK = aE$, or is that wrong? If correct, why do we use use the minimum operation?

Here is the digital book. Quote from page 20.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ There seems to be a typo: $Y$ should denote output, not $u$. $\endgroup$ – FooBar Apr 23 '15 at 13:40
2
$\begingroup$

The min operation is known as a Leontief production function http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leontief_production_function

You're right that with Leontief production functions, the equilibrium is always aE=uK, which is to say that production is linear, and factors are consumed in fixed proportion. There are some real world examples for this: to drive, for example, you need a car and wheels in an exact 1:4 proportion, and having 6 wheels per car doesn't let you produce anything more than 4 wheels per car. But for the most part the aim is just to motivate a linear approximation to a multi-sector economy, which we can easily plug into a computer and run economy-wide computations with. We didn't have high powered computers in those days (c. 1950), so computing multi-sector non-linear production technologies was simply out of the question.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.