Lower yields through open market operations

When the fed wants to put downward pressure on treasury rates, one tool it can use is open market purchases of the tenor it wants to push yields down on. Mechanically, I assume this can be achieved 2 ways:

  • open market purchases in the secondary market (previously auctioned securities)
  • purchases at auction with primary dealers acting as an intermediary.

Option 1 it's clear how the yields would be affected. The fed just places bids at a price sufficient to hit the yield it is targeting, and since that is likely above the prevailing market price, it will be accepted. Similar bonds will then price up to reflect this price action. New auctions will not price higher (yield less than) these off-the-run issues in a meaningful way, otherwise market participants would just buy the off-the-runs.

Option 2 is less clear to me. Treasury auctions are "single-price", meaning that everybody submits their minimum accepted yield, and the highest accepted yield (the "stop") is what all participants receive1. Here, if demand is strong and the primary dealer doesn't take down the entire auction, what would happen when other participants bid higher than the dealers? Could that neutralize their efforts to suppress yields? For example, let's say the auction is for $500B of 10 year notes, and the following bids are received:

1 The Treasury Auction Process

bidder bid yield bid size accepted size
primary dealer* 3.00% 200B 200B
Hedge Fund 1 3.20% 100B 100B
Hedge Fund 2 3.28% 150B 150B
Hedge Fund 3** 3.33% 75B 50B
Money Market Fund 3.45% 100B 0B

*Fed, using primary dealer as intermediary
**Hedge Fund 3 is the "stop yield" bid

The fed (through primary dealer) wants yields at 3.00%, but they only bid 200 of the full 500 issuance. Hedge Fund 3 has the highest bid (the "stop") so the entire auction prices at 3.33%. How is this issue avoided in practice? Does the dealer just take the whole bid down? Does the treasury simply refuse bids below a certain yield (which would mean they are working with the fed)? Are purchases at auction not really a tool used to push yields lower (only secondary market purchases)?

Increasing yields through open market operations

Going in the other direction, it would appear the fed has less control. There is nothing to be done at auction other than not participate, so the primary tool to raise yields would reducing their SOMA portfolio, which can be accomplished two ways:

  • Not reinvesting maturities (what is currently happening)
  • Selling SOMA holdings outright in the secondary market

Option 1 not reinvesting maturities removes reserves from the private sector as new issuances by the treasury must be met by non-fed institutions. If cash is limited enough, they will probably demand a higher yield for treasuries. This seems more of a blunt tool, as it would be hard to target a tenor (depends on what the treasury issues) and similarly difficult to know how much reserve withdraw equates to how much rate increase, and where on the curve that increase occurs. If demand for treasuries is particularly strong, I would assume it may be possible that, even flooding the market with new issuances, yields remain stubbornly low.

Option 2 - would provide more precise control, as the fed could place an ask price at the yield it wants to target (and for the tenor), and if that yield is above market participants will take it. Even if there is strong demand there is no chance of yields remaining below what the fed desires (like in the auction example) because the fed just keeps selling at prices below market until it's desired yield is achieved.

So my general questions - are the assumptions I've made above correct for the 4 options (2 lowering yield, 2 increasing)? For auction purchases, is the bidding conundrum I outlined an issue?

  • $\begingroup$ I think you have confused the relationship between yield and price in the the second option for lowering yields (bidding). The lower the price, the higher the yield (and the other way round). So the primary dealer would actually win, as he offers the highest price. In that sense there is no bidding conundrum. $\endgroup$
    – BrsG
    Aug 24, 2022 at 18:39
  • $\begingroup$ @BrsG How so? Everything I mention there is in reference to yields, not prices. I understand the relationship between prices and yield. $\endgroup$
    – Solaxun
    Aug 24, 2022 at 19:49
  • $\begingroup$ The treasury prefers to sell at the highest price, so the bid with the highest price wins. So, in your example, where bidders use yields, the lowest yield wins, not the highest. $\endgroup$
    – BrsG
    Aug 24, 2022 at 19:54
  • $\begingroup$ @BrsG No, that's not correct. "The Treasury conducts note auctions in a 'single-price' format. After the close of bidding, it subtracts the noncompetitive bids from the total quantity of securities offered and then accepts competitive bids in order of increasing yield, until it has exhausted the offering. The highest accepted yield is called the 'stop.' Bids specifying yields below the stop are filled in full, bids above the stop are rejected, and bids at the stop are filled pro rata. All auction awards are made at a single price, computed from the yield at which the auction stopped." $\endgroup$
    – Solaxun
    Aug 24, 2022 at 20:02
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Indeed: "[it] accepts competitive bids in order of increasing yield". That means, it accepts offers with the lowest yield first. In your example, it's the other way round! $\endgroup$
    – BrsG
    Aug 25, 2022 at 9:34

1 Answer 1


For Option 1 (lowering yield) the procedure is not described correctly in the OP. The Fed does not place bids in the market. In fact, they ask primary dealers for their offer price for a range of different securities, entered on the Fed website at around 10am on specific dates. They then use an algorithm to decide which prices to accept, publishing the results promptly. The details can be found on Fed https://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/domestic-market-operations/monetary-policy-implementation/treasury-securities/treasury-securities-operational-details

Lowering yields Option 2 is incorrectly described. The Fed does not bid competitively at Treasury auctions. Instead, they purchase securities at the auction yield determined by the private market participants. One could still argue that their activity drives yields down, because it reduces the amount of securities that are being sold to the public. Note also that the Fed is not allowed to increase their portfolio size using Treasury auctions. They are only allowed to roll over maturing securities. Details: https://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/treasury-rollover-faq

For raising yields, Option 1 is described almost correctly. The Fed sets a monthly principal amount of Treasury face value that it allows to mature without reinvestment. Let’s say it is 80bn for a given month. But if 100bn of securities mature that month, 20bn will be reinvested, giving the Fed some control over maturity buckets.

Raising yields Option 2 has never been implemented. Theoretically it could be, but so far the Fed has chosen the more passive route of allowing securities to mature.

  • $\begingroup$ On the last paragraph: Has the Fed not agreed on a minimum monthly run-off and decided that, if the maturing bonds fall below the minimum, to top it off by actively selling? $\endgroup$
    – BrsG
    Aug 28, 2022 at 10:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I didn’t see that announcement. $\endgroup$
    – dm63
    Aug 28, 2022 at 15:42
  • $\begingroup$ @BrsG For Treasuries, if there are not enough coupon maturities to hit the 60B cap they will allow bills to run off. For MBS, if there are not enough repayments to hit the 35B monthly cap they will let the balance roll off from treasuries. So far, no outright sales have been planned. $\endgroup$
    – Solaxun
    Aug 28, 2022 at 21:01
  • $\begingroup$ @dm63 For option 1 lowering, if the dealers are just showing asks to the fed via a multiple price auction, how can the fed ensure the asks prices are high enough to achieve their target? For option 2 lowering, I know that the fed places non-competitive bids for rolls, but for new purchases, I wasn't sure if the primary dealers would place bids at targeted prices to hit the feds desired yield, since the fed could then purchase from the dealers. Basically, the dealer is just an intermediary to keep the transactions at arm's length. Lastly, Option 2 raising - a small amount of outright sales.. $\endgroup$
    – Solaxun
    Aug 28, 2022 at 21:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @solaxun option 2 lowering: no the Fed does not act through primary dealers at Treasury auctions. $\endgroup$
    – dm63
    Aug 29, 2022 at 3:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.