# 2 intercepts in a probit model about WTO/GATT concessions?

I am currently reading a research paper(Developing Countries and General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement by Marc L. BUSCH and Eric REINHARDT) and in the part where they come to the regression where they use an ordered probit model for level of concession reached, in the descriptive table there is data for 2 coefficients, labeled "intercept 1" and "intercept 2". I cannot understand why there 2? Only reason i can think for intercepts being different is the presence of a dummy variable, but the dummy variables are separately specified? Or is there some conceptual thing I'm missing? Could anyone help?

The paper:

Marc L. Busch, Eric Reinhardt, 'Developing Countries and General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement', (2003), 37, Journal of World Trade, Issue 4, pp. 719-735

The dependent variable is level of concessions, which takes on one of three values:

$$y_i \in \{\text{None, Partial, Full}\}$$

If you know the ordered probit model, then you should see that a dependent variable with three levels implies the inclusion of two intercepts. For more information on ordered probit see for example this slidedeck, especially slide 10.

Very short explanation by me:

Ordered probit with three outcomes

There is a latent model with observed explanatory variables and unobserved dependent variable $$y_i^*$$, specified as follows

$$y_i^*=x_i'\beta+u_i \qquad u_i \sim N(0,1)$$

The way in which $$y_i^*$$ translates into a value for the observed dependent variable $$y_i$$ is given by:

$$y_i=a \times \mathbf{1}(y_i^*<\alpha_1) + b \times \mathbf{1}(\alpha_1

where $$\mathbf{1}(\cdot)$$ is an indicator function (it equals 1 iff the condition in the parentheses is met). $$a$$, $$b$$, $$c$$ are the three different outcomes.

It can be solved with maximum likelihood for the parameters $$(\beta, \alpha_1, \alpha_2)$$

$$\alpha_1$$ and $$\alpha_2$$ are the two intercepts.