3
$\begingroup$

Is there a way how to precisely compute the expansion path?

I know a consumer's utility function $U(\boldsymbol{x})$, I know the budget constraint $\sum P_i x_i \leq M$, I am able to compute the marshallian demands $\boldsymbol{D}(\boldsymbol{P}, M)$, therefore I am able to gain optimal point for any given prices and income.

If I plot this, using sliders, I can observe how the optimal point moves with changes in one single price. This movement, however, seems to be on a curve, the expansion path. Is there some way how to compute it analythically? Would the differentiation of demands be reasonable approach or is this too naive:

$\qquad \qquad x_1^{EP} = \frac{\partial D_1(\boldsymbol{P}, M)}{\partial P_1} \qquad \qquad x_2^{EP} = \frac{\partial D_2(\boldsymbol{P}, M)}{\partial P_1}$

What would be the next step? This would be two variables but I would like to plug it into single curve...

Or is there another approach?

EDIT: The expansion path I search for is also called price consumption curve in literature. I could find it by fitting few points (see illustration below), however, how can I find this analythically?

expansion path

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ So you want $x_i$ as a function of $P_i$ is that correct? At first glance I suggest maximizing the Lagrangian. $\endgroup$
    – Daniel
    Mar 23 at 14:06

3 Answers 3

4
$\begingroup$

The answer depends on what you mean by "computing the expansion path".

Variant (i): For fixed $p_2$ and $M$, you want to compute the optimal points $\boldsymbol{x}=(x_1,x_2)$ as a function of $p_1$.

That's easy: $\boldsymbol{x}=\boldsymbol{D}(p_1,p_2,M)$.

Variant (ii): For fixed $p_2$ and $M$, you want to compute the $x_2$-component of the optimal points $\boldsymbol{x}=(x_1,x_2)$ as a function of $x_1$.

This needs some work: You are given the functions $x_1=D_1(p_1,p_2,M)$ and $x_2=D_2(p_1,p_2,M)$. From the equation for $x_1$ express (if possible) $p_1$ as a function $p_1=P_1(x_1,p_2,M)$ and substitute for $p_1$ in $D_2$ to get $x_2=D_2(P_1(x_1,p_2,M),p_2,M)$. For fixed $p_2$ and $M$, this gives $x_2$ as a function of $x_1$, the graph of which is the red curve in $x_1$-$x_2$-space.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much! Yes, I was searching for variant (ii). $\endgroup$
    – Athaeneus
    Mar 23 at 16:17
1
$\begingroup$

You compute it by setting $MRS$ equals relative prices:

$\frac{\frac{\partial U}{\partial x}}{\frac{\partial U}{\partial y}} = \frac{p_x}{p_y}$,

solving for one variable in terms of the other.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much! However, this is not correct answer. I will edit the question such that it is more clear what I want. The answer you proposed gives me just a line between optimum and the zero/zero point. It is not the expansion path for prices. The expansion path for prices should not change with the change in price. $\endgroup$
    – Athaeneus
    Mar 23 at 8:40
1
$\begingroup$

As previously stated by VARulle you simply compute your Marshallian demand for your goods, fix your income and just vary your prices.

To illustrate for cobb douglas preferences $U(x_1,x_2)=x_1^\alpha x_2^{1-\alpha}$ the marshallian demands for $x_1$ and $x_2$ are: $$x_1(p_1,m)=\frac{\alpha m}{p_1}, x_2(p_1,m)=\frac{(1-\alpha)m}{p_2}$$

all you need to do is hold $m$ constant to see the shape of these "single price changing" expansion paths.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.