0
$\begingroup$

enter image description here

according to the theory (if p-p1=q-q1), the total revenue remains the same because the demand decreases by the same percentage price does. If this is the elasticity of a product, the company increasing prices will lead to a decrease in demand but the total revenue will remain the same but the amount spent on producing these products decrease when the demand decreases corresponding to the increase in price.. so since the company is now spending less in the production, isn't it more profitable to increase the price than not change the price?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ If the supplier has a monopoly, then increasing demand for the same total revenue and lower cost would be profitable. But in a competitive market, a supplier raising prices will lead to lower revenue for that supplier as consumers switch to other cheaper suppliers. $\endgroup$
    – Henry
    Oct 23 at 15:14

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
1
$\begingroup$

The theory says that total revenue remains the same. That is not the same as claiming total profit is same.

Total revenue is by definition given as a price times quantity: $R=PQ$.

Total profit on the other hand is given as total revenue minus total costs: $\Pi= PQ -TC$.

Total revenue won’t change when demand is unit elastic (for small changes from current point), but total profit can change.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.