2
$\begingroup$

In this answer, I was pointed to the utility function $$ U(c, y) = c - \frac{c^2}{2} + y $$ with corresponding demand function $$ c(p) = 1 -p $$ which is inelastic for $p < 1/2$. Something that escaped my attention then was the following: if I have understood correctly, the implication is that demand is most inelastic when $p \to 0$ (where consumption is maximised) and most elastic when $p \to 1$ (where consumption vanishes).

This is counter-intuitive to me. I was envisioning a demand function for a necessary good which captures the intuition that consumption is elastic when $p \to 0$ (since consumption is large here), but becomes increasingly inelastic as $p \to 1$ (since the agent becomes increasingly unwilling to forego consumption of the necessary good). So something like $$ \epsilon_p = -1 + p $$ which would imply the demand function $$ c(w, p) = f(w) \frac{e^p}{p} \ , $$ where $f$ is an increasing function of $w$, the available income. In fact, applying similar reasoning to income elasticity, and demanding $$ \epsilon_w = w $$ we arrive at $$ c(w, p) = e^w \frac{e^p}{p}\ . $$ I lack the experience to answer the following: is this a reasonable demand function, and does it show up anywhere in the literature? If so, how does one derive the associated utility function? I have browsed some related posts on this site but they all begin with the indirect utility function, which I don't have here. Finally, if there are established utility functions which yield demand functions with the desired properties, I would be grateful for a reference.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I don't think it is clear that consumption is elastic when price, $P\rightarrow 0$, when law of demand holds. In fact, when $P$ is close to to $0$ and consumption level $(Q)$ is high, then the percentage change in quantity $\frac{\Delta Q}{Q}$ is small, and percentage change in price is $\frac{\Delta P}{P}$ is relatively high, so that the elasticity $\frac{\Delta Q}{Q}/\frac{\Delta P}{P}$ is unambiguously small. $\endgroup$
    – Amit
    Commented Jun 25 at 14:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I don't follow all the things you were saying ( background is not economics ) but Herb Simon derived certainty equivalence in the 50's which basically allows for the use of the expected value operator in dynamic programming-optimization. Note that certainty equivalence only holds under quadratic utility so that may be why that utility formulation is so popular. $\endgroup$
    – mark leeds
    Commented Jun 30 at 15:26
  • $\begingroup$ @Amit thanks, you make a good point. What would be a reasonable functional form for the price-elasticity $\epsilon_p$ that captures the intuition that the good is necessary? $\endgroup$
    – Anthony
    Commented Jul 8 at 8:35
  • $\begingroup$ @Amit Also, would you agree with my assessment of the quadratic utility function? $\endgroup$
    – Anthony
    Commented Jul 8 at 8:40
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Anthony Please see this functional form of utility, if you are looking for necessities vs other goods: x.com/amit_k_goyal/status/1717156615315427769 $\endgroup$
    – Amit
    Commented Jul 8 at 11:40

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.