3
$\begingroup$

I am reading the article by Acemoglu and Restrepo (AEA Papers and Proceedings, 2018) and have encountered some difficulties deriving equation (1). I hope you can help me work through it.

The aggregate output is given by

\begin{equation} Y = F(A_K K, A_L L) \end{equation}

where $K$ denotes capital, $L$ represents labor, and $A_K$ and $A_L$ denote capital-augmenting and labor-augmenting technology, respectively. The production function $F$ is assumed to be continuously differentiable, concave, and to exhibit constant returns to scale.

Let $F_K$ and $F_L$ denote the marginal products of capital and labor, respectively.

Assuming a competitive labor market, the wage rate $W$ must satisfy

\begin{equation} \frac{\partial Y}{\partial L} = W \quad \text{, i.e.,} \quad W = A_L F_L(A_K K, A_L L) \end{equation}

The labor share in national income is denoted by

\begin{equation} s_L = \frac{WL}{Y} \end{equation}

and the capital share is $s_K = 1 - s_L$.

The article then claims that

\begin{equation} \frac{d \ln W}{d \ln A_K} = \frac{s_K}{\epsilon_{KL}} \end{equation}

where $\epsilon_{KL} = - \frac{d \ln (K/L)}{d \ln (F_K/F_L)}$ is the elasticity of substitution between capital and labor.

I attempted to derive the result $\frac{d \ln W}{d \ln A_K} = \frac{s_K}{\epsilon_{KL}}$ as follows:

First, note that $\ln W = \ln A_L + \ln F_L(A_K K, A_L L)$. Therefore,

\begin{equation} \frac{d \ln W}{d \ln A_K} = \frac{\frac{d W}{W}}{\frac{d A_K}{A_K}} = \frac{d W}{d A_K} \cdot \frac{A_K}{W} \end{equation}

Substituting $W = A_L F_L$ into the equation, we have

\begin{equation} \frac{d \ln W}{d \ln A_K} = A_L \cdot \frac{\partial F_L}{\partial (A_K K)} \cdot \frac{\partial (A_K K)}{\partial A_K} \cdot \frac{A_K}{A_L F_L} \end{equation}

This simplifies to:

\begin{equation} \frac{d \ln W}{d \ln A_K} = \frac{A_K K}{F_L} \cdot \frac{\partial F_L}{\partial (A_K K)} \end{equation}

To make further progress, I attempted to multiply and divide by $Y$, resulting in:

\begin{equation} \frac{d \ln W}{d \ln A_K} = \frac{s_K Y}{F_L} \cdot \frac{\partial F_L}{\partial (A_K K)} \end{equation}

However, I am struggling to complete the derivation and arrive at the final equation given in the paper. Could someone help me bridge the gap?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

There is a mistake at the end of your working. The capital share is $s_K=\frac{RK}{Y}=\frac{A_K F_K K}{Y}$, not $\frac{A_K K}{Y}$. Fixing this small mistake, your final expression is (with obvious arguments suppressed), $$\frac{d \ln W}{d \ln A_K}=s_K \frac{Y}{F_K F_L} \frac{\partial F_L}{\partial A_K K}= s_K \frac{F F_{KL}}{F_K F_L}$$

For the final step, one wants to show that $\frac{1}{\varepsilon_{KL}}=\frac{F(A_K K, A_L L) F_{LK}(A_K K, A_LL)}{F_K(A_K K, A_L L) F_L(A_K K, A_L L)}$

To this end, since $F$ is homogeneous of degree 1, its partial derivatives are homogeneous of degree 0. So, $$\begin{align*} \ln (F_K/F_L) &=\ln \left(F_K\left(1,\frac{A_L L}{A_K K}\right)\right)-\ln \left(F_L\left(\frac{A_K K}{A_L L},1\right)\right) \\ &=\ln \left(F_K\left(1,\frac{A_L }{A_K}\exp\{-\ln(K/L)\}\right)\right)-\ln \left(F_L\left(\frac{A_K}{A_L}\exp\{\ln(K/L)\},1\right)\right) \end{align*}$$ Whence, $$\frac{d \ln (F_K/F_L)}{d \ln (K/L)}=-\frac{1}{F_K}\frac{A_L L}{A_K K}F_{KL}\left(1,\frac{A_L L}{A_K K}\right)-\frac{1}{F_L}\frac{A_K K}{A_L L}F_{KL}\left(\frac{A_K K}{A_L L},1\right)$$ Since $F$ is homogeneous of degree 1, $F_{KL}$ is homogenous of degree -1, so our expression simplifies to $$\begin{align*}\frac{d \ln (F_K/F_L)}{d \ln (K/L)}&=-\frac{1}{F_K(A_K K,A_L L)}\frac{A_L L}{A_K K}F_{KL}\left(1,\frac{A_L L}{A_K K}\right)-\frac{1}{F_L(A_K K,A_L L)}\frac{A_K K}{A_L L}F_{KL}\left(\frac{A_K K}{A_L L},1\right) \\ &=-\frac{1}{F_K}A_L LF_{KL}\left(A_K K,A_L L\right)-\frac{1}{F_L}A_K KF_{KL}\left(A_K K,A_L L\right) \\ &=- \frac{F_{KL}\left(A_K K,A_L L\right)}{F_K(A_K K,A_L L)F_L(A_K K,A_L L)}\left[A_L L F_L(A_K K,A_L L)+A_KKF_K(A_K K,A_L L)\right] \\ &=-\frac{F_{KL}\left(A_K K,A_L L\right)F(A_K K,A_L L)}{F_K(A_K K,A_L L)F_L(A_K K,A_L L)} \end{align*}$$

Where I have used Euler's theorem in the final line.

Hence, $$\frac{1}{\varepsilon_{KL}}=-\frac{d \ln (F_K/F_L)}{d\ln (K/L)}=\frac{F(A_K K, A_L L) F_{LK}(A_K K, A_LL)}{F_K(A_K K, A_L L) F_L(A_K K, A_L L)}$$ and the result follows.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer. Could you please clarify some of the notation? In the first line, you define $F_{KL} \equiv \frac{\partial F_L}{\partial (A_K K)}$, but then when you compute $\frac{d \ln \left(\frac{F_K}{F_L}\right)}{d \left(\frac{K}{L}\right)}$, it seems that $F_{KL} \equiv \frac{\partial F_K}{\partial \left(\frac{K}{L}\right)}$. What am I missing? $\endgroup$
    – Dimitru
    Commented Aug 9 at 9:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Dimitru Those are cross partial derivatives. By $F_{KL}$ I mean the function obtained by differentiating $F$ with respect to $K$ and then with respect to $L$ (or the other way around). The notations $\frac{\partial F_L}{\partial (A_K K)}$ or $\frac{\partial F_K}{\partial (K/L)}$ are confusing since they don't tell us which argument the derivatives are taken with respect to, nor what the arguments are. That is why I explicitly wrote out the arguments of the functions throughout, since these do matter for the derivation. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 9 at 9:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I got it. There was I typo when you defined the elasticity of substitution (the log before $K/L$ was missing). Let me make all the computations and I'm sure they will work. After that, I will vote the answer. Thanks $\endgroup$
    – Dimitru
    Commented Aug 9 at 9:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.