0
$\begingroup$

I have a utility function

$$u(x_1, x_2, x_3) = \min \{2x_1 + x_3, x_2/2\} $$

I would have assumed that the relationship established is $2x_1 + x_3 = x_2/2$ but my solution manual has it as $$x_1 + 2x_2 = x_3/2 $$

I'm very confused

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You are right, the optimal choice i.e. the Marshallian demand in this problem satisfy $2x_1+x_3=\frac{x_2}{2}$. $\endgroup$
    – Amit
    Commented Aug 20 at 17:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Your solution manual appears to be wrong, unless there's a typo or the suggested solution is a simplification after factoring in the prices (which have not been provided here). $\endgroup$
    – Herr K.
    Commented Aug 20 at 18:04
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah I was worried about that. My workout reaches as far as rearranching the relationship and substituting x2 = 4x1 + 2x3 into the endowment function/ ("budget constraint") to obtain m = p1x2 + 4p2x1 + 2p2x3 + p3x3 but I'm not sure how to progress from that point $\endgroup$
    – AnonGal
    Commented Aug 20 at 19:50

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

Given the utility maximisation problem,

\begin{eqnarray*}\max_{(x_1,x_2,x_3)\in\mathbb{R}^3_+} & \min\left(2x_1+x_3,\frac{x_2}{2}\right) \\ \text{s.t. } & p_1x_1+p_2x_2+p_3x_3\leq M\end{eqnarray*} where $p_1>0$, $p_2>0$, $p_3>0$, and $M\geq 0$ are given.

Solving this problem, we get the Marshallian demand as \begin{eqnarray*}(x_1^d,x_2^d,x_3^d)(p_1,p_2,p_3,M)\in \begin{cases} \left\{\left(\dfrac{M}{p_1+4p_2},\dfrac{4M}{p_1+4p_2},0\right)\right\} & \text{if } p_1<2p_3 \\ \left\{\left(0,\dfrac{2M}{2p_2+p_3},\dfrac{M}{2p_2+p_3}\right)\right\} & \text{if } p_1>2p_3 \\ \left\{\left(\dfrac{\theta M}{p_1+4p_2},\dfrac{4M}{p_1+4p_2},\dfrac{(1-\theta)M}{2p_2+p_3}\right)|\theta\in[0,1]\right\} & \text{if } p_1=2p_3\end{cases}\end{eqnarray*}

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Why are we comparing p1 with 2p3 instead of just p3? And why are we comparing to P3 and not P2, my solution manual uses p2/2 $\endgroup$
    – AnonGal
    Commented Aug 20 at 20:07
  • $\begingroup$ Because we need to choose between $x_1$ and $x_3$ since the two are substitutes, and here the expression is $2x_1+x_3$. $\endgroup$
    – Amit
    Commented Aug 21 at 8:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.