2
$\begingroup$

The cubic total cost function usually take the form

$TC(q)=a+bq+cq^{2}+dq^{3} \qquad a,b,d>0, c<0$ and $c^{2}<4bd$

I know that from a constraint maximization problem

$min\quad wL+vK$

subject to

$q_{0}=f(k,l)$

i can express it with the lagrangean function

$\mathcal{L}=wl+vk+\lambda(q_{0}-f(k,l))$

with some algebra for the case of a Cobb-Douglas production function $q_{0}=k^{\alpha}l^{\beta}$ i can reach

$TC=q^{\frac{1}{\alpha+\beta}}w^{\frac{\beta}{\alpha+\beta}}v^{\frac{\alpha}{\alpha+\beta}}\left(\frac{\alpha+\beta}{\alpha^{\frac{\alpha}{\alpha+\beta}}\beta^{\frac{\beta}{\alpha+\beta}}}\right)$

I could give values to $\alpha$ and $\beta$ to obtain a cubic function, but not the one I described in the preamble. It could also fix some other factor such as the size of the factory, but would not work.

Any idea?

Thanks in advance

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ You write $TC(q)$ usually takes this very specific form. Can you please post a reference/source? I have never seen these parameter restrictions before. $\endgroup$ – Giskard Jun 6 '15 at 23:37
  • $\begingroup$ The texts do not usually specify this. But, in practice, these restrictions $a,b,c>0, \quad c<0$ and $c^{2}<3bd$ make sense to not have solutions in the field of complex numbers. a text that uses this (page 2): ijecm.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/2214.pdf $\endgroup$ – Héctor Jun 6 '15 at 23:48
1
$\begingroup$

A note on the parameter constraints: $$TC(q)=a+bq+cq^{2}+dq^{3} = a + q(b+cq+dq^{2})$$ It appears that what we want is that for the second degree polynomial to not take negative values. This would require for it to not have real and positive roots. Since $c<0$, then if there are real roots one of them will be positive. This would imply that for an interval of positive values of $q$ the 2nd degree polynomial will take on negative values, and marginal cost will turn negative. So we need the discriminant to be negative, and so $c^2 - 4bd < 0 \implies c^2 < 4bd$. I don't see whey they write "$3$" instead of "$4$".

-__________________________________

As for obtaining such a cost function rigorously from a production function:
The reference is Silberberg. E (1990), "The Structure of Economics" (2nd ed), ch. 9.

A) When the production function is homogeneous of degree $r$, then the cost function has the form

$$C(q,\mathbb w) = q^{1/r} \cdot h(\mathbb w)$$

where $h(\mathbb w)$ is a function of prices (of input factors), and it is homogeneous of degree one (or "linearly homogeneous").

B) When the production function is homothetic, which can be represented as a monotonic function of a homogeneous of degree one function, then the cost function remains multiplicatively separable in output and prices for some function $J(q)$:

$$C(q,\mathbb w) = J(q)\cdot h(\mathbb w)$$

But again, since homotheticity is a monotonic transformation of homogeneity of degree one, $J(q)$ should not be expected to take any polynomial form like the one you seek.

So none of the usual functional specifications for production functions will give a cost function like the one you want to arrive at. And indeed in papers with such cost functions I have never seen a derivation of the underlying production function.

If any positive result comes up, I will return.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Given a Cobb-Douglas production function your cost function will be cubic exactly if $\alpha + \beta = \frac{1}{3}$, and in this case you will have $a = b = c = 0$. There is no going around this. If you want to have the kind of cost function you describe you will have to slightly alter your Cobb-Douglas function, e.g. $$ f(k,l) = (k-1)^{\alpha} \cdot (l-2)^{\frac{1}{3} - \alpha}. $$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.