Say I'm solving for consumption given income, and we assume that an interior solution exists:

$$ \max_c U(c, Y)\\ C(Y) = \arg\max_c U(c, Y)\\ $$

However, there is no closed-form solution for $C(Y)$. But I know it is cont. differentiable. Now I am not interested in $C(Y)$, but I want to know the sign of $C'(Y)$. Here was my approach:

Define the first-order condition as $G(c,Y) = 0$. Differentiate:

$$ \frac{d}{d Y} G(c,Y) = \frac{\partial G(c,Y)}{\partial Y} + \frac{\partial G(c,Y)}{\partial c}\frac{d c}{d Y} = 0 $$

Now I am somewhat stuck: How can I actually compute $\frac{d c}{d Y}$? That's what I'm, after all. I seem to remember that the envelope theorem says that $\partial c/\partial Y$ should be zero. How do I proceed?


1 Answer 1


The first order condition is $U_1(C(Y),Y)=0$, where $U_i$ means the partial derivative with respect to the $i$th argument.

Now, totally differentiate with respect to $Y$: $$U_{12}(C(Y),Y)+U_{11}(C(Y),Y)C'(Y)=0.$$ This can be rearranged to give $$C'(Y)=-\frac{U_{12}(C(Y),Y)}{U_{11}(C(Y),Y)}.$$

Usually, we expect the objective function is concave (i.e. $U_{11}<0$), so the sign of $C'(Y)$ is the same as the sign of $U_{12}(C(Y),Y)$.

Usually, when applying this kind of comparative static trick, the theory tells us what the sign of $U_{12}$ should be. As an example, if a entrepreneur's output as a function of effort and skill is $y(e,s)$, you might think that $y_{12}>0$ (i.e. an increase in effort yields a bigger increase in output for more skilled people). The analagous exercise to the one you are conducting above would then yield $y_{12}>0\implies e'(s)>0$ so more skilled entrepreneurs try harder.

It's hard to know what the appropriate assumption on $U_{12}$ in your example might be because it's not clear why income is in the utility function in the first place and why $U$ isn't just increasing in $c$. Perhaps you have some application in mind that can pin this down.

The envelope theorem would have a different use here. Suppose we found the optimal $C(Y)$ and are interested in the question "evaluated at $C(Y)$, how does an increase in income affect utility"?

The answer is

$$\frac{d U(C(Y),Y)}{dY}=\underbrace{U_1(C(Y),Y)}_{=0}C'(Y)+U_2(C(Y),Y)$$

The envelope theorem tells us that we can ignore the first term (i.e. the indirect effect of $Y$ on $C$) because the first order condition for optimal choice of $C$ (i.e. $U_1=0$) guarantees this effect is zero.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.