Let $X = (x_*,x^*)$ be an interval in the real line and denote by $\Delta(X)$ the set of simple probability distributions on $X$. Consider a preference relation $\succcurlyeq$ on $\Delta(X)$ that satisfies the axioms of expected utility theory. If $\succcurlyeq$ displays monotonicity with respect to first order stochastic dominance and risk aversion then for all $p \in \Delta(X)$ the certainty equivalent of $p$ exists and is unique.
Sketch of the proof:
1) We define the certainty equivalent of lottery $p$: $CE_p \sim \int_{X}u(x)p(x)dx$
2) We know that if $p$ FOSD $q$ then $p\succcurlyeq q$
3) Because of risk aversion: $\int_{X}u(x)p(x)dx \leq u(\int_{X}xp(x)dx) =u(p)$
4) We want to show that $\exists$ a lottery, call it $s$ such that $CE_p \sim s$; in this respect (from 3 above) we know that $p \succcurlyeq s$; We then pick a particular lottery $q$ such that $p \succcurlyeq q$
5) Since by assumption $\succcurlyeq$ on $\Delta(X)$ satisfies the axioms of expected utility theorem (in particular continuity) there exists a unique $\alpha$ such that $\alpha p + (1-\alpha) q \sim s$ ( see MWG p. 177). We therefore proved that $\exists$ a compound lottery $s$ that is the certainty equivalent of lottery $p$.
QUESTION: Am I missing any detail in the proof?