In Intriligator (2002, p. 143) we find the following statement:

\begin{align} C = \{(x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n) : x_j \geq 0,~j=1,2,\ldots,n\} \subset [0,\infty)^n \end{align} Thus commodity space is the nonnegative orthant of Euclidean $n$-space, a closed, convex set.

I'm rather confused why $C$ is supposed to be closed, because $x_j$ is not bounded from above. However, we may argue that $C$ is closed, because its complement \begin{align} C^c \subset (-\infty,0)^n \end{align} is open.

  • Still, isn't it appropriate to say that $C$ is half-closed? Am I hairsplitting here?

A closed set does not need to be bounded. For instance, the set $[0,\infty)$ is closed but unbounded.

Formally, a set is closed if it contains all its limit points. You can easily verify that it is the case for your $C$. Take a sequence of elements $x^m=(x_1^m,\cdots,x_n^m) \in C$ that converges to a vector $x^{*}=(x_1^{*},\cdots,x_n^{*})$ under any appropriate topology. The $j$-th coordinate of $x^{*}$, $x_j^{*}$, is the limit of the sequence $x_j^{m}$. Since all $x_j^{m}$ are nonnegative real numbers, so is the case for the limit $x_j^{*}$. Since this is true for all $j$, $x^{*}$ also belongs to $C$.

  • $\begingroup$ Ok, I'd like to provide a simple example to make sure, that I got the concept. Let $X=(0,1]$ and fix $x^k=1/k$. Now $X$ is open, because $\lim_{k\to\infty} x^k = 0 \not\in X$? However, $Y=[0,1]$ is closed? $\endgroup$ – clueless Dec 5 '15 at 14:58
  • $\begingroup$ $X$ is not closed, you are right, because of the example you mentionned. But $X$ is not open either because it contains 1, which is one of its boundary points: the set $(0,1)$ is open, but not $(0,1]$. I suggest you skim through an introductory topology textbook to think of the definitions of openness and closedness again. $\endgroup$ – Oliv Dec 5 '15 at 15:11
  • $\begingroup$ ...That is to say, attaching infinity in the set of real makes the set "even more closed" because it is more than certain that all real numbers will be in there, since infinity exceeds them all (informally or in Abraham Robinson's rigorous "non-standard" approach). @clueless. Remember that we say "a continuous function has global extrema if the domain is closed and bounded". If the properties went together, we would not have to invoke them both. $\endgroup$ – Alecos Papadopoulos Dec 5 '15 at 18:50
  • $\begingroup$ @clueless: A set is closed if it contains all its limit points. The set $X=(0,1]$ is not closed because one of its limit points, $0$, is not contained in the set $X$. However, $[0,\infty)$ is closed because "$\infty$" is not a limit point of the set (note that "$\infty$" is not a real number). $\endgroup$ – Herr K. Dec 6 '15 at 4:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.