As of May 31, 2023, we have updated our Code of Conduct.
8 votes
Accepted

Why do we need Complementary Slackness Condition for Karush-Kuhn-Tucker Conditions

Solving a non-linear programming (with inequality constraints) is about trial and error. You don't know a priori if a constraint is active. You consider all the possible cases satisfying your ...
Tony's user avatar
  • 665
6 votes
Accepted

Lagrange Multiplier Dual Meaning?

The Lagrange multiplier is both of the above, both statements are equivalent. In the classic consumer problem $\max U(x,y)$ s.t. $p_x x + p_y y = I$ whose Lagrangian is $\mathcal{L}(x,y,\lambda) = U(x,...
Nicolas Torres's user avatar
5 votes
Accepted

What are the assumptions made about fixed points in the dynamics equations of Recursive macroeconomics?

On pages 53-55 of the Stokey, Lucas, with Prescott (1989) book they discuss the Contraction Mapping Theorem. This theorem guarantees existence and uniqueness of the solution (one fixed point). The ...
Fića's user avatar
  • 487
5 votes
Accepted

Existence and uniqueness of demand, and symmetry implies equal demands given equal prices

Proof by contradiction. Suppose $(x_1^*, x_2^*)$ solves the problem and $x_1^* \neq x_2^*$ is true. By symmetry of the utility and equal prices, $(x_2^*, x_1^*)$ which is not the same bundle as $(x_1^*...
Amit's user avatar
  • 7,185
4 votes

Use of zero profit condition in determining unique solution

If the technology is CRS, and the parameters are such that 0 profit is both maximal and attainable with nonzero production, then the optimal solution is not unique, any multiple of it will also be ...
Giskard's user avatar
  • 28.1k
4 votes
Accepted

The formula for expansion path

The answer depends on what you mean by "computing the expansion path". Variant (i): For fixed $p_2$ and $M$, you want to compute the optimal points $\boldsymbol{x}=(x_1,x_2)$ as a function ...
VARulle's user avatar
  • 6,202
3 votes
Accepted

Bellman Equation & Envelope Theorem

The key thing to note here is that in the optimum, $c_t$ will depend on $k_t$. Thus, the value function is \begin{align} V(k_t, t) &= \max\{u(c_t) + \beta V(f(k_t) - c_t, t + 1)\}\\ &= u(c_t(...
Wittgenstein's Poker's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

Quasiconvex Constraints in Maximisation

Consider the maximisation problem : $$\max_x f(x) \text{ s.t. } g(x) \leq c$$ Note that If $f$ is quasi-concave and $g$ is quasi-convex, then the set of solutions to the above problem is either an ...
Amit's user avatar
  • 7,185
3 votes
Accepted

Quasi-convex constraints using monotonic functions

Real-valued Monotonic functions defined on real line or subset of real line are both quasi-concave and quasi-convex, but that is not necessarily the case if the function is defined on $\mathbb{R}^n$ ...
Amit's user avatar
  • 7,185
3 votes
Accepted

Calculating the Compensating Variation with $M^2$

The left hand side expression corresponds to the new utility with the increased price and new budget $M - \Delta M$. The income is now $M - \Delta M$ because we replaced the old income $M$ with $M - \...
Nicolas Torres's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

Simplfying Euler equation under expectations

A formal assumption and twice ignoring Jensen's inequality can lead to the approximation. FORMAL ASSUMPTION $$ {\rm Cov} \left[C_{j,t+1}^{-\sigma}, \,\frac{R_{t+1}}{P_{t+1}}\right] =0. $$ Technically, ...
Alecos Papadopoulos's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

Utility maximization for a household consisting of a woman and a man, with gender discrimination

In principle, using Lagrange multipliers instead of substitution should be the same. Lagrange multipliers are important when the constraint functions can't be explicitated, otherwise they are not ...
BakerStreet's user avatar
  • 2,717
3 votes

Lagrange Multiplier Dual Meaning?

In general the Lagrange multipliers from a constrained optimization problem takes on the interpretation of the value of adjusting the "size" of the constraint in question. There can be many ...
EconJohn's user avatar
  • 8,034
3 votes

Lagrange Multiplier Dual Meaning?

Consider the following constraint optimization with an equality constraint: $$\begin{align} \max_{(x,y)\in\mathbb{R}^2} \quad & f(x,y) \\ \textrm{s.t.} \quad & g(x,y)=c \end{align}$$ The ...
mynameparv's user avatar
3 votes

Lagrange Multiplier Dual Meaning?

I'm purposefully handwavy here; getting things formally right can be very subtle. Suppose you could ignore the constraint. Then you do your usual unconstrained maximization problem, and the marginal ...
Michael Greinecker's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

CRS, Homothetic Functions, and constant MRTS

I think I’m generally missing the added value of a homothetic function vs homogenous function. The added value of homothetic functions is that they are a wider class with respect to homogeneous ...
BakerStreet's user avatar
  • 2,717
3 votes
Accepted

Arguments for Concavity or Quasi-concavity

I will try to address your queries in the order you've asked them by providing the necessary definitions and procedures to find the answers you're looking for. The first approach is valid and it is ...
mynameparv's user avatar
2 votes

Utility maximization across yield curves?

Your maximization problem is $$ \max_{x_1,x_2} x_1 \cdot (300 - 2x_1) + x_2 \cdot (200-1.25x_2) - x_1 - x_2 $$ subject to $x_1 + x_2 \leq \overline{x}$ where $\overline{x}$ denotes the budget. The ...
Giskard's user avatar
  • 28.1k
2 votes
Accepted

Budget-feasible set in a portfolio choice problem

The agent owns nothing initially but the endowment. If their endowment would be $0$ in every state, then it should be clear that their initial wealth is zero, and they could only afford a portfolio ...
Michael Greinecker's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

how to derive marshallian demand functions from leontief preferences?

The utility function looks like this: $(big)^2 - (small)^2$ Since $small$ is something that takes away utility, you want $small = 0$. Otherwise, you’re spending some money in getting unhappier, ...
Nicolas Torres's user avatar
2 votes

What is the Lagrangian a function of?

If you write $L(x,\theta,\lambda)$ this means that the unknowns of the lagrangian function that can be estimated are $x,\theta,\lambda$. This implies that your first order conditions will be 3, i.e., ...
Tony's user avatar
  • 665
2 votes
Accepted

Are other 'variables' in demand functions always fixed?

Generally you would write the hicksian demand $h(p_x,p_y,U)$. But when you graph it is easier to think of it as a single variable function. What you see on a typical demand curve (assuming it is a ...
Nicolas Torres's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

Remainder term in Linear Approximations going to 0

Question: How do I show that: $\lim \limits_{∆θ_i \to 0} \frac{R}{∆θ_i} = 0$ [...] Question: How do we show that: $\lim \limits_{∆x_i \to 0} \frac{R_2(∆x)}{(∆x)^2} = 0$ As you can see from your ...
BakerStreet's user avatar
  • 2,717
2 votes

Why do we need Complementary Slackness Condition for Karush-Kuhn-Tucker Conditions

Opportunity given, there can be cases where we have both $\lambda_j=0$ and $g_j(x^*) = c_j$. This happens when the unconstrained optimum $x^*_u$ equals the constrained one. In such a case, while the ...
Alecos Papadopoulos's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

Solving first-order conditions to this social planner's problem

For two periods, the objective function is $$...+\,\beta^{t} \left\{ \sigma[u(q_{t}) - q_{t}] + \theta U(C_{t}) + \bar{N} - N_{t} \right\} \\+ \beta^{t+1} \left\{ \sigma[u(q_{t+1}) - q_{t+1}] + \theta ...
Alecos Papadopoulos's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

Second Order Condition - Always means second derivative?

Yes, this is terminology borrowed from mathematics. First order conditions relate to derivative of first order and second order conditions to derivative of second order. It has nothing to do with ...
1muflon1's user avatar
  • 51.3k
2 votes
Accepted

Mixed Partial Derivatives in Profit Function

In my classes, they’re called Marshallian or uncompensated demands, as in consumer theory. The partial derivative on the right hand side means to directly differentiate the demand for $z$ (the ...
Nicolas Torres's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

Inappropriate use of Calculus in estimating ΔCost?

If this is correct, is it unsurprising that it is wildly different from the estimate given that the change in capital was a 50% increase, and calculus is designed to approximate small changes? ...
BakerStreet's user avatar
  • 2,717
2 votes
Accepted

Quadratic Form Single Summation notation

The sum $\sum_{i \le j}=a_{ij}x_ix_j$ goes over all indices $(i,j)$ with $i\leq j$. We can do that by either summing over all $i$ and then for each $i$ all $j\geq i$, which would give us $$\sum_{i=1}^...
Michael Greinecker's user avatar
2 votes

Perfect Complement Utility Function Maximisation

Proof: Suppose there is an optimal bundle $x^\star$ such that $p \cdot x^\star < m$. By continuity there is a neighborhood $N$ of $x^\star$ such that $p\cdot x<m$ and $u(x)\le u(x^\star)$ for ...
VARulle's user avatar
  • 6,202

Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible