Timeline for Why Law of Supply indicate direct relation between price and supply?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Sep 4, 2016 at 0:48 | history | suggested | luchonacho | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
use correct quote code
|
| Sep 3, 2016 at 17:13 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 4, 2016 at 0:48 | |||||
| Mar 3, 2016 at 16:05 | vote | accept | strNOcat | ||
| Jan 23, 2016 at 16:28 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 26, 2016 at 14:21 | |||||
| Jan 23, 2016 at 16:13 | comment | added | BKay | Possible duplicate of Why doesn't the price of gold drop as mining occurs that produces more gold? | |
| Jan 23, 2016 at 16:04 | comment | added | Airdish | Your issue lies in the statement. The law of supply holds only when everything else is constant. For the price relation, we call supply as extending, not increasing. Increasing supply means supply shifts to the right, which would reduce the price if demand stays the same. | |
| Jan 23, 2016 at 15:49 | answer | added | Alecos Papadopoulos | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 23, 2016 at 9:32 | answer | added | Giskard | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 23, 2016 at 9:20 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 23, 2016 at 16:13 | |||||
| Jan 23, 2016 at 9:16 | history | asked | strNOcat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |