Timeline for Data on bilateral real exchange rate
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2017 at 20:41 | vote | accept | Zhonger | ||
| Sep 14, 2017 at 20:41 | |||||
| Sep 14, 2017 at 20:32 | comment | added | Zhonger | thanks for your information. I just want to know where I can get information on bilateral exchange rates without the need to convert it from nominal exchange rates :) | |
| Sep 13, 2017 at 19:52 | comment | added | luchonacho | @Zhonger Notice that I am not making this up. This is standard theory. For example, see this. | |
| Sep 13, 2017 at 18:05 | comment | added | luchonacho | @Zhonger As any index (or variable), it can be rebased. 100 is normally used for simplicity, as it eases the calculation of percentages. It still does not imply the number has a meaning in terms of currency. | |
| Sep 13, 2017 at 18:03 | comment | added | Zhonger | Thanks, but a real effective exchange rate is a number that is close to 100. | |
| Sep 13, 2017 at 15:42 | history | edited | luchonacho | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 224 characters in body
|
| Sep 13, 2017 at 15:36 | history | undeleted | luchonacho | ||
| Sep 13, 2017 at 15:36 | history | edited | luchonacho | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 224 characters in body
|
| Sep 13, 2017 at 15:23 | history | deleted | luchonacho | via Vote | |
| Sep 13, 2017 at 15:22 | history | answered | luchonacho | CC BY-SA 3.0 |