I would like to find the set of rationalizable strategies for this 4x4 game:
The first thing I did was try and find all PSNE. I found two, the ones I bolded.
Thus, my answer to this question is that the set of rationalizable strategies for Player 1 is {T, Y} and the set of rationalizable strategies for Player 2 is {B, C}.
Should I assign arbitrary probability values and find which mixed strategies dominate other mixed strategiesIs this answer correct?
I would like to find the set of rationalizable strategies for this 4x4 game:
The first thing I did was try and find all PSNE. I found two, the ones I bolded.
Thus, my answer to this question is that the set of rationalizable strategies for Player 1 is {T, Y} and the set of rationalizable strategies for Player 2 is {B, C}.
Should I assign arbitrary probability values and find which mixed strategies dominate other mixed strategies?
I would like to find the set of rationalizable strategies for this 4x4 game:
The first thing I did was try and find all PSNE. I found two, the ones I bolded.
Thus, my answer to this question is that the set of rationalizable strategies for Player 1 is {T, Y} and the set of rationalizable strategies for Player 2 is {B, C}.
Is this answer correct?
I would like to find the set of rationalizable strategies for this 4x4 game:
The first thing I did was try and find all PSNE. I found two, the ones I bolded.
I foundThus, my answer to this question is that Row T weakly dominates Row Mthe set of rationalizable strategies for Player 1 is {T, Y} and I also found that Column D weakly dominates Column Athe set of rationalizable strategies for Player 2 is {B, C}.
But I am not sure how to proceed forwards.Should I cannotassign arbitrary probability values and find a row or column that strictly dominateswhich mixed strategies dominate other mixed strategies?
I would like to find the set of rationalizable strategies for this 4x4 game:
The first thing I did was try and find all PSNE. I found two, the ones I bolded.
I found that Row T weakly dominates Row M, and I also found that Column D weakly dominates Column A.
But I am not sure how to proceed forwards. I cannot find a row or column that strictly dominates
I would like to find the set of rationalizable strategies for this 4x4 game:
The first thing I did was try and find all PSNE. I found two, the ones I bolded.
Thus, my answer to this question is that the set of rationalizable strategies for Player 1 is {T, Y} and the set of rationalizable strategies for Player 2 is {B, C}.
Should I assign arbitrary probability values and find which mixed strategies dominate other mixed strategies?
I would like to find the set of rationalizable strategies for this 4x4 game:
The first thing I did was try and find all PSNE. I found two, the ones I bolded.
However, now I am stuck. I found that Row T weakly dominates Row M.
, and I also found that Column D weakly dominates Column A.
How canBut I determine which row/columnam not sure how to eliminate first?
Would appreciate any help.
Thanksproceed forwards. I cannot find a row or column that strictly dominates
I would like to find the set of rationalizable strategies for this 4x4 game:
The first thing I did was try and find all PSNE. I found two, the ones I bolded.
However, now I am stuck. I found that Row T weakly dominates Row M.
and I also found that Column D weakly dominates Column A.
How can I determine which row/column to eliminate first?
Would appreciate any help.
Thanks.
I would like to find the set of rationalizable strategies for this 4x4 game:
The first thing I did was try and find all PSNE. I found two, the ones I bolded.
I found that Row T weakly dominates Row M, and I also found that Column D weakly dominates Column A.
But I am not sure how to proceed forwards. I cannot find a row or column that strictly dominates
