Consider the following version of the stochastic Ak model written as a Bellman equation: $$v(A,k)=max\ log(c)+\beta E[v(A',k')|A]$$ $$s.t\ k'+c\leq Ak$$ and non-negatitvities. $A$ is a stationary first order Markov process. $E[\cdot|A]$ denotes the expectations of · conditional on $A$. We assume that $\beta\in(0, 1)$.

Now we can also show that the value function $v$ can be expressed as $$v(A,k)=\frac{log(k)}{1-\beta}+v(A,1).$$

If we denote $E[v(A',1)|A]$ as $D(A)$, which is a constant (i.e., is only a function of the exogenous parameters of the model and the realization of the stochastic process A, but is not a function of the endogenous variables). Use this and the new equation to substitute into the maximization problem in the Bellman equation. We should get a simple maximization problem in $c$ and $k$.

And what the solution is given as $$v(A,k)=max\ log(c)+\frac{\beta}{1-\beta}log(k')+\beta D(A).$$

Could someone show the steps behind this derivation

  • $\begingroup$ Hi I am struggled with the equation $v(A, k)=\frac{\log (k)}{1-\beta}+v(A, 1)$. The answer below takes it as given. Could you show the derivation of it? Thanks. $\endgroup$ – Alalalalaki Mar 27 at 16:59
  • $\begingroup$ I was looking through my notes and what my professor had derived goes something like this: He has considered $\sigma=1$ so we have $u(c)=log c$. Value function is something like this: $V(\lambda k_0, A_0)=\sum\beta_t\sum P(A^t)log(\lambda c_t (A^t))$ or $V(\lambda k_0, A_0)=\sum\beta_t\sum P(A^t)[log\lambda +log(c_t (A^t))$ where $\sum\beta_t\sum P(A^t)[log\lambda= log\lambda/1-\beta$ and $\sum\beta_t\sum P(A^t)log(c_t (A^t)=V(k_0,A_0)$ thus, $v(k,A)=log k/1-\beta+V(1,A)$. I guess a similar logic @Alalalalaki but someone can add something that may be missing $\endgroup$ – Maybeline Lee Mar 27 at 17:24
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for your reply. However I am still a little bit confused about the derivation. First, do you know why is the case that $V\left(\lambda k_{0}, A_{0}\right)=\sum \beta_{t} \sum P\left(A^{t}\right) \log \left(\lambda c_{t}\left(A^{t}\right)\right)$, i.e. why can we simply scale the consumption function at each period when we have a scaled initial capital? Second, given your derivation, it seems that we only have $v(k, A)=\log k / 1-\beta+V(1, A)$ when $k_0=1$. Do you assume that $k_0=1$? Can we get the same result if $k_0 \neq1$? $\endgroup$ – Alalalalaki Mar 27 at 18:11
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not sure if this reply will be helpful but previously (before going on to this special case) we have considered $v(k,A)=max\ c^{1-\sigma}/1-\sigma + \beta k^{1-\sigma}E[v(1,A')|A]$ s.t the constraint. Then we have considered that the utility is homothetic in c,k'. In regard to the second question, I assume that we don't get the same result if $k_0\neq 1$, maybe no closed-form solution or something. $\endgroup$ – Maybeline Lee Mar 27 at 18:30

I think you may substitute it directly as mentioned?

$$v(A,k) = \max log(c) + \beta E[v(A',k')|A]$$

Applying the value function expression (note period change): $v(A',k') = \frac{log(k')}{1-\beta} + v(A',1)$

Substituting: $$v(A,k) = \max log(c) + \beta E\left[\frac{log(k')}{1-\beta} + v(A',1)|A\right]$$

By linearity: $$v(A,k) = \max log(c) + \beta E\left[\frac{log(k')}{1-\beta}|A\right] + E\left[v(A',1)|A\right]$$

Since $E\left[v(A',1)|A\right] = D(A)$: $$v(A,k) = \max log(c) + \beta \frac{log(k')}{1-\beta} + \beta D(A)$$

  • $\begingroup$ I see. It was the period change in the value function that threw me off. Thank you :) $\endgroup$ – Maybeline Lee Mar 27 at 10:55
  • $\begingroup$ Hi I am struggled with the equation $v(A, k)=\frac{\log (k)}{1-\beta}+v(A, 1)$. Could you show also the derivation of it? $\endgroup$ – Alalalalaki Mar 27 at 12:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.