The following excerpt is taken from Martin J. Osborne's book on game theory. When considering a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium under a continuous random variable, why do we consider actions with zero probability? Here, $F(0)$ represents the probability of playing an action less than or equal to zero but since $a_i>=0$, this is the probability of playing an action equal to zero.
I thought that the definition of a mixed strategy specifies that expected payoffs must be equal only under actions played with positive probability so why does this work?