Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Game theory is a study of situations of strategic interaction between two or more players in which there is a predefined set of rules and an outcome associated with each choice taken.
6
votes
Accepted
Infinitely repeated game: prisoners' dilemma
the payoff from play the trigger strategy will be:
$$ \sum_{i=0}^{\infty}(x+1) \delta^i=\frac{x+1}{1-\delta}$$
if I deviate and I play $l$ or $d$ the payoff will be
$$ 2x + \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}x \del …
2
votes
0
answers
240
views
Subgame Perfect Equilibrium with Pure Strategies in Sequential Games [closed]
If I have a sequential game, i.e. in each node (that I will call $t$) only one player choose an strategy from a finite space of strategies, Is it true there always exist a subgame perfect equilibrium …
2
votes
1
answer
364
views
How to demonstrate that a game always have a subgame-perfect equilibrium in pure strategies?
If I have an specific extensive game, with only a finite set of strategies, how can I demonstrate that the game always have a subgame-perfect equilibrium in pure strategies? My first intuition was to …
1
vote
Accepted
Cournot equilibrium question
To answer your question I will assume that
$\bf{A1}$ firm 2 always "trust" in the output reported by firm 1, and
$\bf{A2}$ firm 1 always "keep its word" if announces an output.
Without $\bf{A1}$ a …