Neumark and Wascher have a paper that surveys recent empirical work on the effects of the minimum wage in detail. It includes a number of tables that nicely summarise the results of a large number (102!) of studies.
They conclude the paper with the following remarks:
Nonetheless, the oft-stated assertion that the new minimum wage
research fails to support the conclusion that the minimum wage reduces
the employment of low-skilled workers is clearly incorrect. Indeed, in our view, the preponderance of the evidence points to disemployment
effects. For example, the studies surveyed in this monograph correspond
to 102 entries in our summary tables. Of these, nearly two thirds
give a relatively consistent (although by no means always statistically
significant) indication of negative employment effects of minimum
wages, while only eight give a relatively consistent indication of positive
employment effects. In addition, we have highlighted in the tables
33 studies (or entries) that we regard as providing the most credible
evidence, and 28 (85 percent) of these point to negative employment
effects. Moreover, when researchers focus on the least-skilled groups
most likely to be adversely affected by minimum wages, the evidence
for disemployment effects seems especially strong. In contrast, we see
very few – if any – cases where a study provides convincing evidence of
positive employment effects of minimum wages, especially among the
studies that focus on broader groups for which the competitive model
predicts disemployment effects.