I use the OECD's Total Support Estimates (TSE), which I think is a proper measure of total agricultural subsidies (but correct me if I'm wrong).

China's TSE is by far the largest at \$239B in 2017 and even its per-capita TSE (PPP*) is higher than the US's.

enter image description here

Here are some explanations I have come across for why agriculture is heavily subsidized in the rich democracies:

  • Rural voters wield disproportionate power.
  • The costs (of the subsidies) are diffuse and so no single voter has much incentive to organize/lobby against the subsidies.
  • Voter inattention: The voters who pay for the subsidies are simply unaware that they are doing so.

However, China is not a democracy and so it would seem that the above explanations do not apply. So what explains China's large agricultural subsidies?

*I think (but am not sure) the TSEs given by the OECD have not been corrected for PPP. And so, I have taken the liberty of converting them.

Google spreadsheet with data and sources.


The first thing that comes to mind is food security. China has a large population to feed and does not want to depend on foreign nations for its food.

A (speculative) second reason may be prevention of domestic unrest. The largest share of China's population still lives in rural areas, and by supporting farmers they may silence protests.

A recent article analysing the drivers of China's agricultural policies by Lopez et al., including the fairly recent shift from taxes to subsidies can be found here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X1630211X

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.