0
$\begingroup$

I am reading "The Environment and Directed Technical Change" by Acemoglu et al. (2012).

I cannot understand how the optimal tax in \eqref{eqA10} is derived. $$\tau_t = \frac{\omega_{t+1} \xi}{\lambda_t \hat{p}_{dt}} \tag{A.10}\label{eqA10}$$

I see why $w_{t+1} \xi $ is there and that the denominator is equal to $\lambda_t \hat{p}_{dt}$ but not sure where this is coming from.

Why wouldn't the Pigouvian tax just be the second term in the price of the dirty good in \eqref{eqA9}?

$$\begin{equation}\begin{aligned} Y_{ct}^{\frac{-1}{\epsilon}}\left(Y_{ct}^{\frac{\epsilon-1}{\epsilon}} + Y_{dt}^{\frac{\epsilon-1}{\epsilon}} \right)^{\frac{1}{\epsilon-1}} &= \hat{p}_{ct} \\ Y_{dt}^{\frac{-1}{\epsilon}}\left(Y_{ct}^{\frac{\epsilon-1}{\epsilon}} + Y_{dt}^{\frac{\epsilon-1}{\epsilon}} \right)^{\frac{1}{\epsilon-1}} - \frac{\omega_{t+1} \xi}{\lambda_t} &= \hat{p}_{dt} \end{aligned} \end{equation} \tag{A.9}\label{eqA9}$$

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

In Chapter 1. General Framework, the authors introduce their model there and explain it step by step.

[...] The two inputs, $Y_c$ (clean) and $Y_d$ (dirty), are produced using labour and sector-specific machines (intermediates), and the production of $Y_d$ may also be a natural exhaustible resource:

$$Y_{ct} = L_{ct}^{1-\alpha} \int_0^1 A_{cit}^{1-\alpha} x_{cit}^\alpha di \;\;\; \text{and} \;\;\; Y_{dt} = R_t^{\alpha_2}L_{dt}^{1-\alpha} \int_0^1 A_{dit}^{1-\alpha_1} x_{dit}^{\alpha_1} di, \tag{5} \label{eq5} $$

where $\alpha, \alpha_1, \alpha_2 \in \left(0,1 \right), \alpha_1+\alpha_2 = \alpha, A_{jit}$ is the quality of machine is the quality of machine of type $i$ used in sector $j \in \left\{c, d \right\}$ at time $t$, $x_{jit}$ is the quantity of this machine, and $R_t$ is the flow consumption from an exhaustible resource at time $t$. [...]

Acemoglu et al. (2012) is defining $\lambda_{jt}$ as the Lagrange multiplier for \eqref{eq5}, then the ratio $\frac{\lambda_{jt}}{\lambda_{t}}$ can be interpreted as the shadow price of input $j$ at time $t$ (relative to the price of the final good). Next, to emphasize this interpretation, the author denotes this ratio by $\hat{p}_{jt}$.

The first-order conditions with respect to $Y_{ct}$ and $Y_{dt}$ then give:

$$ \begin{equation}\begin{aligned} Y_{ct}^{\frac{-1}{\epsilon}}\left(Y_{ct}^{\frac{\epsilon-1}{\epsilon}} + Y_{dt}^{\frac{\epsilon-1}{\epsilon}} \right)^{\frac{1}{\epsilon-1}} &= \hat{p}_{ct} \\ Y_{dt}^{\frac{-1}{\epsilon}}\left(Y_{ct}^{\frac{\epsilon-1}{\epsilon}} + Y_{dt}^{\frac{\epsilon-1}{\epsilon}} \right)^{\frac{1}{\epsilon-1}} - \frac{\omega_{t+1} \xi}{\lambda_t} &= \hat{p}_{dt} \\ \end{aligned} \end{equation} \tag{A.9} $$

And so, the carbon tax is equal to:

$$ \tau_t = \frac{\omega_{t+1} \xi}{\lambda_{dt}} = \frac{\omega_{t+1} \xi}{\lambda_t \frac{\lambda_{dt}}{\lambda_t}} = \frac{\omega_{t+1} \xi}{\lambda_t \hat{p}_{dt}}, \tag{A.10} $$

where $\omega_{t+1}$ is the shadow value of one unit of environmental quality at time $t + 1$, $\xi$ denotes the rate of environmental degradation resulting from the production of dirty inputs. And so the environmental externality is corrected by introducing a wedge between the marginal product of dirty input in the production of the final good and its shadow value which corresponds to the carbon tax $\tau_t$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.