Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options answers only not deleted user 1442

the mathematical study of strategies for optimal decision-making between options involving different risks or expectations of gain or loss depending on the outcome.

4 votes

Violation of completeness axiom (simple everyday examples)

There is a problem in how you translate completeness into behavior. Let $R$ be any binary relation, representing preferences, on a set $X$ of alternatives and $A\subseteq X$ be a nonempty set of alter …
Michael Greinecker's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

Lower bound for the utility in a decision problem with uncertainty

Trivially, the decision maker can ignore all additional information and simply play the same action they would play without any information. The optimal strategy must be then at least as good, on aver …
Michael Greinecker's user avatar
5 votes

Lexicographic Preference Relation on the QxR

Note first that for each nontrivial (more than one point) compact interval $I$, there exists a strictly increasing function from $\mathbb{R}$ to $I$. Let $\langle q_1,q_2, q_3,\ldots\rangle$ be an en …
Michael Greinecker's user avatar
3 votes

Can Debreu's axiomatization of cardinal utility use equivalent relation instead of preferenc...

Here is a partial answer: The two conditions are equivalent if preferences are strongly monotone. To see this, let $x_Iy\succ x_Iy'$. Let $e=(1,1,\ldots,1)\in\mathbb{R}^n$. By strong monotonicity and …
Michael Greinecker's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Information structure for complete information

Not every probability distribution comes from a density. In particular, point masses have no density (with respect to Lebesgue measure). Here, being perfectly informed requires that the conditional di …
Michael Greinecker's user avatar
1 vote

Trying to find a proof for Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference with general choice set

This is a special case of Theorem 1 of [Richter, Marcel K. "Revealed preference theory." Econometrica (1966): 635-645.]
Michael Greinecker's user avatar
3 votes

Minimal assumption for a “certainty equivalence” exists

Here is an example that shows that certainty equivalents need not exist: Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to (0,1)$ be an increasing bijection. Let $0<\alpha< f(1)-f(0)$ Define $u:\mathbb{R}^\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{R}$ …
Michael Greinecker's user avatar
7 votes
Accepted

Ordinally Separable Utility Representation

Here is the sketch of a proof. All we need is that every continuous weak order on each $X_i$ admits a continuous utility representation. One sufficient condition is that each $X_i$ is a connected sep …
Michael Greinecker's user avatar
3 votes

Debreu's ordinal representation theorem is unique up to a positive monotonic transformation,...

The other answer explained why the result is trivial; here is why it is not true without the modifier "on the range" and under the most literal reading. Consider $[0,1]\cup(2,3]$ with the usual order. …
Michael Greinecker's user avatar
3 votes

In revealed preference (RP), is any two points $x,y$ related by the indirect revealed prefer...

No. Let $X=[-1,1]$ and $u:X\to\mathbb{R}$ be given by $u(x)=-|x|$. Then, $u$ represents strictly convex preferences. Moreover, $0.5\succ -1$. Now, the only points that $0.5$ is revealed preferred to a …
Michael Greinecker's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

Equivalence of two definitions of monotone preference

Let $\succeq$ be a relation on $\mathbb{R}^l_+$ such that $x\gg y$ implies $x\succeq y$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}^l_+$, and such that all upper contour sets are closed. Then $x\geq y$ implies $x\succe …
Michael Greinecker's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

Non-nullity assumption in vNM theorem of cardinal utility

A preference such that $p\succeq q$ for all lotteries $p$ and $q$ clearly does (!) have a cardinal utility representation: The utility function over outcomes must be constant, and this is clearly also …
Michael Greinecker's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

Does the revealed preference result "equivalence of utility and concave utility" generalize ...

The paper [Reny, Philip J. "A characterization of rationalizable consumer behavior." Econometrica 83.1 (2015): 175-192.] answers the question. Here is the abstract: For an arbitrary data set $D =\{(p …
Michael Greinecker's user avatar
8 votes

What is the point of considering only pure strategies in a game? How could you restrict peop...

If in equilibrium, a player "chooses a mixed strategy" that plays $H$ and $T$ with positive probability, $H$, and $T$ must be both optimal choices. It is a standard result that for a (subjective or ob …
Michael Greinecker's user avatar
6 votes

Most utility functions under risk and uncertainty generalizes expected utility. What is dead...

Many people accept the axiomatizations of expected utility as normatively appealing, especially in contexts of pure risk. For people with this view, rational decision-makers should behave in accordanc …
Michael Greinecker's user avatar

15 30 50 per page