Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
the mathematical study of strategies for optimal decision-making between options involving different risks or expectations of gain or loss depending on the outcome.
4
votes
Violation of completeness axiom (simple everyday examples)
There is a problem in how you translate completeness into behavior. Let $R$ be any binary relation, representing preferences, on a set $X$ of alternatives and $A\subseteq X$ be a nonempty set of alter …
2
votes
Accepted
Lower bound for the utility in a decision problem with uncertainty
Trivially, the decision maker can ignore all additional information and simply play the same action they would play without any information. The optimal strategy must be then at least as good, on aver …
5
votes
Lexicographic Preference Relation on the QxR
Note first that for each nontrivial (more than one point) compact interval $I$, there exists a strictly increasing function from $\mathbb{R}$ to $I$.
Let $\langle q_1,q_2, q_3,\ldots\rangle$ be an en …
3
votes
Can Debreu's axiomatization of cardinal utility use equivalent relation instead of preferenc...
Here is a partial answer: The two conditions are equivalent if preferences are strongly monotone. To see this, let $x_Iy\succ x_Iy'$. Let $e=(1,1,\ldots,1)\in\mathbb{R}^n$. By strong monotonicity and …
4
votes
Accepted
Information structure for complete information
Not every probability distribution comes from a density. In particular, point masses have no density (with respect to Lebesgue measure). Here, being perfectly informed requires that the conditional di …
1
vote
Trying to find a proof for Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference with general choice set
This is a special case of Theorem 1 of [Richter, Marcel K. "Revealed preference theory." Econometrica (1966): 635-645.]
3
votes
Minimal assumption for a “certainty equivalence” exists
Here is an example that shows that certainty equivalents need not exist: Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to (0,1)$ be an increasing bijection. Let $0<\alpha< f(1)-f(0)$ Define $u:\mathbb{R}^\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{R}$ …
7
votes
Accepted
Ordinally Separable Utility Representation
Here is the sketch of a proof. All we need is that every continuous weak order on each $X_i$ admits a continuous utility representation. One sufficient condition is that each $X_i$ is a connected sep …
3
votes
Debreu's ordinal representation theorem is unique up to a positive monotonic transformation,...
The other answer explained why the result is trivial; here is why it is not true without the modifier "on the range" and under the most literal reading.
Consider $[0,1]\cup(2,3]$ with the usual order. …
3
votes
In revealed preference (RP), is any two points $x,y$ related by the indirect revealed prefer...
No. Let $X=[-1,1]$ and $u:X\to\mathbb{R}$ be given by $u(x)=-|x|$. Then, $u$ represents strictly convex preferences. Moreover, $0.5\succ -1$. Now, the only points that $0.5$ is revealed preferred to a …
3
votes
Accepted
Equivalence of two definitions of monotone preference
Let $\succeq$ be a relation on $\mathbb{R}^l_+$ such that $x\gg y$ implies $x\succeq y$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}^l_+$, and such that all upper contour sets are closed. Then $x\geq y$ implies $x\succe …
2
votes
Accepted
Non-nullity assumption in vNM theorem of cardinal utility
A preference such that $p\succeq q$ for all lotteries $p$ and $q$ clearly does (!) have a cardinal utility representation: The utility function over outcomes must be constant, and this is clearly also …
3
votes
Accepted
Does the revealed preference result "equivalence of utility and concave utility" generalize ...
The paper [Reny, Philip J. "A characterization of rationalizable consumer behavior." Econometrica 83.1 (2015): 175-192.] answers the question. Here is the abstract:
For an arbitrary data set $D =\{(p …
8
votes
What is the point of considering only pure strategies in a game? How could you restrict peop...
If in equilibrium, a player "chooses a mixed strategy" that plays $H$ and $T$ with positive probability, $H$, and $T$ must be both optimal choices. It is a standard result that for a (subjective or ob …
6
votes
Most utility functions under risk and uncertainty generalizes expected utility. What is dead...
Many people accept the axiomatizations of expected utility as normatively appealing, especially in contexts of pure risk. For people with this view, rational decision-makers should behave in accordanc …