0
$\begingroup$

Exercise 2.2.3 from Introduction to economic analysis by McAfee:

An entrepreneur has a factory that produces $L\alpha$ widgets, where $\alpha<1$, when $L$ hours of labor is used. The cost of labor (wage and benefits) is $w$ per hour. If the entrepreneur maximizes profit, what is the supply curve for widgets?

Hint: The entrepreneur’s profit, as a function of the price, is $pL\alpha – wL$. The entrepreneur chooses the amount of labor to maximize profit. Find the amount of labor that maximizes, which is a function of $p$, $w$ and $\alpha$. The supply is the amount of output produced, which is $L\alpha$.

How to approach this at all? I do understand that given a price(per unit) $p$, since the amount of supply produced is $L\alpha$, the expected profit without net is $pL\alpha$ and the net profit is therefore $$pL\alpha - wL$$ $wL$ is the amount you pay to the labors for $L$ hours.

What does the author mean by maximizing profit by choosing the amount of labor here? Is it just $L$?

But then equating the derivative to $0$ would result in $$p\alpha = w \Leftrightarrow p = \frac{w}{\alpha} = \frac{wL}{q},$$ here $q = L\alpha$ being the amount of quantity produced as in the hint. This can't be the supply curve since it is decreasing as $q \rightarrow \infty$. Am I wrong somehow?

My questions:

  1. What is the amount of labor?
  2. How to approach this question at all?
$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

The producer's problem is

$ \begin{align*} \max_{l \in \mathbb{R_+}} &\; pq - wL \\ \text{subject to} &\; \begin{alignedat}[t]{1} q & \leq f(L) \\ f(L) & = L\alpha \end{alignedat} \end{align*} $

Simply put, we want to maximise profit $\pi(L) = pL\alpha - wL$

Note that $\pi(L)$ is a linear function of $L$, so this will require a little more care than just setting the derivative to 0!

$ \pi(L) = pL\alpha - wL \\ \pi'(L) = p\alpha - w \\ \pi''(L) = 0 $

Since the second derivative is 0, the first derivative test for maximisation is inconclusive. (This generalises across linear functions - their rate of change is constant).

In this case, let's look more carefully at $\pi'(L)$, which is a constant.

Case 1: $\pi'(L) > 0 $
Profit is an increasing function of labour. Without any constraints on $L$, the entrepreneur can always increase profit by employing an additional unit of $L$. So no maximum exists in this case.

Case 2: $\pi'(L) < 0 $
Profit is a decreasing function of labour. So every unit of labour employed actually reduces profit (or increases losses). The maximum profit therefore is where we employ the least amount of $L$, i.e., $L=0$.

Case 3: $\pi'(L) = 0 $
Profit is constant at all points, independent of the units of labour employed. So the optimum amount of labour is any $L \in \mathbb{R_+}$

Summarizing, we get the labour demand $L^d$ as a function of $(p, w, \alpha)$:

$L^d(p, w, \alpha) \in \begin{cases} \phi, \ \ \ \textrm{if } p\alpha > w \\ \mathbb{R_+}, \ \ \ \textrm{if } p\alpha = w \\ \{0\}, \ \ \ \textrm{if } p\alpha < w \\ \end{cases}$

The supply curve is obtained by feeding $L^d$ back into our production function: $q^s(p, w, \alpha) = f(L^d(p, w, \alpha)) = \alpha L^d(p, w, \alpha)$

EDIT: Here's a visual to build intuition: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/hfbj67ulf0

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Note that our production function is $Y=\alpha L$ where Y is the number of widgets produced, then our objective is to maximise profits of the of the entrepreneur so, The Profit Maximisation problem of the entrepreneur is, $$\max_{Y\geq 0}Y-wL$$ after substituting for Y, $$\max_{L\geq 0}\alpha p L-wL$$ For solving the above problem note that our objective is linear in $L$ so solving the problem will give us the unconditional labor demand function of the entrepreneur, $$L^d(\alpha,p,w)\in \begin{cases}\phi & \text{if} \ \ \alpha p > w\\\mathbb{R}^+ & \text{if} \ \ \alpha p = w\\ \{0\} & \text{if} \ \ \alpha p < w\\ \end{cases}$$ Substituting it back into the production function $Y=\alpha L$ will give us the optimal supply function of the entrepreneur, $$Y^s(\alpha,p,w)\in \begin{cases}\phi & \text{if} \ \ \alpha p>w \\ \mathbb{R}^+ & \text{if} \ \ \alpha p = w\\ \{0\} & \text{if} \ \ \alpha p < w\\ \end{cases}$$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.