3
$\begingroup$

$\max_{x(t),u(t)}\int _0^Te^{-t}f(x(t),u(t))dt$,

st derivative $x_t=g(t,x(t),u(t))$. Prove that $H$ is constant.

My try2:

consider the Hamiltonian $$ H(x(t), u(t)) = e^{-t}f(x(t), u(t)) + \lambda(t) g(x(t), u(t)). $$ Then: $$ \begin{align*} \frac{d}{dt} H(x(t), u(t)) &= (e^{-t}f_x + \lambda g_x)\dot x + \underbrace{(H_u)}_{=0} \dot u + g(x(t), u(t)) \dot \lambda,\\ &= \dot x(e^{-t}f_x + \lambda g_x) + g(x(t), u(t)) \underbrace{(-e^{-t}f_x - \lambda g_x)}_{=\dot \lambda_t},\\ &= \underbrace{(\dot x - g(x(t), u(t))}_{=0} (e^{-t}f_x + \lambda g_x),\\ &= 0 \end{align*} $$

References: Chiang (1992), https://people.stfx.ca/tleo/advmacrolec3.pdf

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ What is the exact text of the problem? I suppose that '$g$ is independent of $t$' doesn't mean that $g$ is constant with respect to $t$ (otherwise, why put $t$ amoing the independent variables?), but that the function $g$ is always the same, irrespective of $t$ $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 1, 2023 at 11:45
  • $\begingroup$ @BakerStreet The context is the current value Hamiltonian and shadow price in macroeconomics. $\endgroup$
    – dodo
    Commented Oct 1, 2023 at 15:32
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, I know, I said the text of the problem, if it is an exercise. I think that the text of the problem doesnt't say you that $g$ is constant, but that we have always the same function $g$ as time $t$ varies. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 1, 2023 at 15:41
  • $\begingroup$ @BakerStreet The exact expression is "g is independent of $t$". I will try to find its precise/rigorous meaning. $\endgroup$
    – dodo
    Commented Oct 1, 2023 at 15:48
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, moreover, even if the value of $g$ is indipendent of $t$, this means that it doesn't depend 'separately' on $t$, but can depend on $t$ through $x(t)$ and $u(t)$, it doesn't mean that it is independent of $x(t)$ and $u(t)$. This is the case when a differential equation is said autonomous, that is, it does't depend on $t$ separately. I don't know what is $x_t$ in the question, I suppose the derivative of $x(t)$ with respect to time, as you wrote 'derivative' before it. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 1, 2023 at 19:33

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Consider the problem: $$ \begin{align*} \max_{u} \int_0^T f(x(t), u(t)) dt& \\ \text{ s.t. } &\dot x = g(x(t), u(t)),\\ &\text{ + boundary conditions} \end{align*} $$

Assume that $g(x,u)$ and $f(x,u)$ are independent of $t$ (given $x$ and $u$). The Hamiltonian is given by: $$ H(x(t), u(t)) = f(x(t), u(t)) + \lambda(t) g(x(t), u(t)) $$ The first order conditions give: $$ \begin{align*} &f_u + \lambda g_u = 0,\\ &\dot \lambda = - f_x - \lambda g_x\\ &\text{and some transversality conditions} \end{align*} $$ Now consider the Hamiltonian $$ H(x(t), u(t)) = f(x(t), u(t) + \lambda(t) g(x(t), u(t)). $$ Then: $$ \begin{align*} \frac{d}{dt} H(x(t), u(t)) &= (f_x + \lambda g_x)\dot x + \underbrace{(f_u + \lambda g_u)}_{=0} \dot u + g(x(t), u(t)) \dot \lambda,\\ &= \dot x(f_x + \lambda g_x) + g(x(t), u(t)) \underbrace{(-f_x - \lambda g_x)}_{=\dot \lambda_t},\\ &= \underbrace{(\dot x - g(x(t), u(t))}_{=0} (f_x + \lambda g_x),\\ &= 0 \end{align*} $$ This shows that $H$ does not change with $t$, so it remains constant over time. The exact value is usually determined by the transversality conditions.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Hi tdm, I put $e^{-t}$ before the $f$ in the title but I forgot to include in the main text. However, I believe your solution still works. I tried it with your method above. Is my understanding correct? $\endgroup$
    – dodo
    Commented Oct 2, 2023 at 9:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.